法律推理及其形式與實(shí)質(zhì).pdf

1、河北大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文法律推理及其形式與實(shí)質(zhì)姓名：王軍寧申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：邏輯學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：耿昭201106AbstractIIAbstractLegalreasoningisoneofceproblemsoflegallogicsitisalsoahotproblemofjurisprudence.Therearemanydeferenceabouttherealizationoflegalreasoningamongthepeop

2、letherootoftheproblemaboutdeferencerealizationisderivedfromthedeferenceofthebasicconceptoflawreasoningtherearenotonlynarrowmeaningbroadmeaningbutalsofmsubstanceaboutbothlawreasoningjusttheargumentaboutthesebasicconceptsd

3、educethecomplexityofthelegalreasoningresearch.Thisthesisincludesthreeparts.Thefirstoneresearchtheontologicalmeaningoflawreasoningespeciallyresearchtheontologicalmeaningofthelawintheviewofthehisticaldevelopment.Realizethe

4、substantiveacteronthebaseofanalsisabouttheontologicalmeaningofthelawreasoningfurthermereaserchthecatigiesoflegalreasoning.Thesecondonediscoursestheacterappliedrangemeaningoffmallegalreasoning.Thethirdonediscoursestheacte

5、rappliedrangemeaningofsubstantivelegalreasoningcomparedwiththefmallegalreasoningsubstantivelegalreasoninginlegalpractice.Thisthesisgetstheconclusionthattherealizationaboutlegalreasoningdependsontherealizationaboutontolog

6、yoftwobasicconcept:lawreasoning.Thedichotomyoffmallegalreasoningsubstantivelegalreasoningreflectsgenerallythedoubleacterofdeterminacyuncertaintyoflegalreasoning.Reaserchtheacterappliedrangeoftwokindsoflegalreasoninginthe

7、viewofmethodologytherelationbetweenthesetwokindsoflegalreasoningisdialecticalunityofopposites.Fthermetherearenotaclearlinebetweenthesetwokindsoflegalreasoning.Advoatedilutingcatigiesbetweenthesetwolegalreasoning.Inthecas